Home Instead vs Visiting Angels
Franchise Comparison (2026)
2026 FDD Data
Home Instead generates 55% higher average revenue ($2.6M vs $1.68M) and has a faster payback period (1.4-3.4 years), but requires higher investment. Visiting Angels offers lower royalties (3-3.5% vs 5%) and lower entry costs, making it accessible to more first-time franchisees.
Home Instead and Visiting Angels are two of the largest senior home care franchises in the United States, both capitalizing on the rapidly growing $150+ billion home care market. Home Instead (founded 1994) pioneered the non-medical senior care franchise model with nearly 1,200 locations worldwide. Visiting Angels has grown to 600+ locations with a lower-cost entry point. For franchise investors, the key differences are revenue potential, royalty structure, and investment requirements. This FDD comparison helps you choose the right senior care franchise.
Quick Comparison
Home Instead
$54,000
Visiting Angels
$49,950 - $79,950
Home Instead
$91K - $270K
Visiting Angels
$125K - $171K
Home Instead
5%
Visiting Angels
3.0% - 3.5%
Home Instead
619
Visiting Angels
600
Home Instead
$2.61M
Visiting Angels
$1.68M
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Investment | ||
| Franchise Fee | $54,000 | $49,950 |
| Total Investment (Low) | $91,040 | $125,460 |
| Total Investment (High) | $269,750 | $171,150 |
| Net Worth Required | $250,000 | $200,000 |
| Liquid Capital Required | $100,000 | $75,000 |
| Ongoing Fees | ||
| Royalty Rate | 5% | 3.5% |
| Advertising Fund | 0% | 0% |
| Technology Fee | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| System Size & Growth | ||
| Total Units | 619 | 600 |
| Franchised Units | 619 | 600 |
| Company-Owned Units | 0 | 0 |
| 3-Year Net Growth | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Financial Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Item 19 Disclosed | Yes | Yes |
| Average Revenue | $2,609,616 | $1,680,000 |
| Median Revenue | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Franchise Terms | ||
| Initial Term | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Renewal Term | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Territory Protection | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Requirements | ||
| Owner-Operator Required | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Training Hours | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Years Franchising | 32 years | 28 years |
| Risk Indicators | ||
| Litigation Matters | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Termination Rate | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
Key Differences
Home Instead averages $2.6M revenue vs Visiting Angels $1.68M
Home Instead charges 5% royalty; Visiting Angels charges 3-3.5% (tiered)
Home Instead investment: $91K-$270K vs Visiting Angels $125K-$171K
Home Instead has faster payback (1.4-3.4 years) due to higher revenue
Home Instead ranks #33 on Franchise 500; Visiting Angels ranks #479
Home Instead has near 1,200 global locations; Visiting Angels has 600+ US locations
Investment Fit Analysis
Who Should Consider Home Instead
Home Instead suits investors seeking the senior care market leader with highest revenue potential, willing to pay premium royalties for stronger brand recognition and support infrastructure.
Highest average revenue in senior care ($2.6M)
Fast payback period (1.4-3.4 years)
World's largest home care network (1,200 locations)
20% veteran discount on franchise fee
SBA loan approval rate strong (366 loans, 0.8% default)
Two-week training at Omaha headquarters
Who Should Consider Visiting Angels
Visiting Angels suits cost-conscious investors who want lower royalties and a proven model, accepting lower average revenue in exchange for keeping more of each dollar earned.
Lower tiered royalties (3.0%-3.5% vs 5%)
Territory-based franchise fee ($50K-$80K by population)
15-18% profit margins reported
600+ US locations
Lower liquid capital requirement ($75K)
Sliding royalty rewards growth
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Dive Deeper?
Download the complete FDD for each franchise to review all 23 items, exhibits, and financial statements.
Disclaimer
This comparison is provided for informational purposes only. Data has been aggregated from publicly available sources including Franchise Disclosure Documents, industry publications, and franchise analysis websites.
Prospective franchisees should review the complete FDD for each franchise, conduct their own due diligence, and consult with qualified legal and financial advisors before making any investment decisions.